Call for Input from Civil Society Supporting the Operationalization of the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Afghanistan (IIMA)
BackgroundThe establishment of the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Afghanistan (IIMA) by the United Nations Human Rights Council marks a historic milestone in advancing accountability for serious human rights violations and international crimes committed in Afghanistan. This achievement is the direct result of nearly three years of sustained advocacy by Afghan civil society organizations, human rights defenders, and victims’ and survivors’ groups, who have consistently and tirelessly called for the establishment of such a mechanism. Their leadership in this process must be recognized as foundational to the IIMA’s creation and must guide its operationalization.The IIMA has the potential to play a transformative role in preserving evidence, advancing investigations, supporting future criminal proceedings, and contributing to the broader justice agenda for victims and survivors. Its effectiveness, however, will depend not only on its mandate and institutional capacity but also on meaningful and sustained engagement with Afghan civil society, victims, survivors, and documentation initiatives that have worked to document violations under extremely challenging circumstances.Over the past two decades — and particularly since August 2021 — Afghan civil society organizations, human rights defenders, victims’ groups, women’s rights organizations, journalists, and documentation initiatives have gathered invaluable information, preserved evidence, supported victims, and maintained documentation efforts despite significant risks. Their experience and expertise should inform both the establishment and the long-term work of the IIMA.It is important that the relationship between the IIMA and Afghan civil society be reciprocal. While civil society will continue to provide documentation, information, and analysis to support the IIMA’s mandate, the mechanism should also establish meaningful channels for consultation and participation of civil society and victims/survivors regarding its working methods, outreach strategies, priorities, and engagement with affected communities. This engagement should not be ad hoc or occasional; rather, the IIMA should develop a clear, dedicated policy that institutionalizes civil society engagement,…

